Murphy v East West Link Supreme Court Challenge website now archived on YCAT

[ A+ ] /[ A- ]

High_Court_29Sept2014

Murphy vs. East West Link at High Court Hearing, 29 September 2014

We have archived the entire Murphy v East West Link Supreme Court Challenge website from 2014- 2015 on YCAT for future reference and have included a new Media Coverage section.

Note: the legal campaign has now finished, this website is an archived record maintained on behalf of the Murphy v East West Toll team.

Finally …… The End Of The Road For Murphy V State Government Of Victoria (July 2015)

It has been a long time, but this Supreme Court challenge, which began in April 2014, is finally over.  The Supreme Court accepted the discontinuation of the case agreed to by both parties on Friday 17 July 2015.

This courageous case was enormously important in the community battle against the deeply flawed East West Link project.

Once again our deepest gratitude goes to Anthony Murphy and his extraordinary, talented and community-minded legal team: Ron Merkel QC, Melinda Richards SC, Julian Burnside AO QC, Simona Gory Barrister, Meghan Fitzgerald, Hollie Golding and all the staff at Fitzroy Legal Services, Paula Shelton and others from Shine Lawyers, and the many other experts, volunteers and community members who helped behind the scenes.

It is a rare and brave thing for a person to take a State Government to court.  It is even rarer to win.  While the case may not have won in a court of law, it won in the court of public opinion and achieved what it set out to do – expose the flawed business case.  Through this case Victorians were made aware of, and became concerned about, the lack of transparency in spending huge amounts of state funds.  This brought the East West Link front of mind in the run up to the election, and played a vital part in the outcome.

The Murphy case drew attention to the accountability of governments to the people. Accountability for the way in which huge amounts of money are spent on the community’s behalf, accountability for listening to what the community wants, not what is a politically expedient.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *